Message146252
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
docs@python, mark.dickinson, python-dev, skrah |
| Date |
2011年10月23日.19:55:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.1864736e-11 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1319399701.74.0.394531537782.issue12965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I've fixed some of the inaccurate comments in Objects/longobject.c, for the default branch; I'm still looking at the Doc update.
This really is a bit of a mess, especially for cases like PyLong_AsVoidPtr, which can either end up calling PyLong_As(Long)Long (which allows conversion via __int__), or PyLong_AsUnsigned(Long)Long (which doesn't).
Ultimately, I think it would make sense to remove all __int__ conversions from Objects/longobject.c; this would affect:
- PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow
- PyLong_AsLong
- PyLong_AsUnsignedLongMask
and the 'LongLong' variants of these. The ramifications of such a change might be quite long-reaching; in particular, I seem to recall that this would affect the 'getargs' machinery.
It could be fun to remove these conversions and see how much of the test-suite fails. :-) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年10月23日 19:55:01 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, skrah, docs@python, python-dev |
| 2011年10月23日 19:55:01 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1319399701.74.0.394531537782.issue12965@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年10月23日 19:55:01 | mark.dickinson | link | issue12965 messages |
| 2011年10月23日 19:55:00 | mark.dickinson | create |
|