Message146193
| Author |
oberstet |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, nailor, oberstet, orsenthil |
| Date |
2011年10月22日.21:18:32 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.4974829e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1319318313.14.0.68314351713.issue13244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I see how you interpret that sentence in the spec, but I would have read it differently:
invalid:
1. ws://example.com/something#somewhere
2. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/
3. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/foo
4. ws://example.com/something?query=foo#bar
valid:
5. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere
6. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere/
7. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere/foo
8. ws://example.com/something?query=foo%23bar
You would take 2. and 3. as valid, but 1. and 4. as invalid, right?
But you are right, the spec does not talk about # in path.
If above is a valid summary of the question, I'd better take that to the Hybi list to get feedback before rushing into anything with urllib .. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年10月22日 21:18:33 | oberstet | set | recipients:
+ oberstet, orsenthil, ezio.melotti, nailor |
| 2011年10月22日 21:18:33 | oberstet | set | messageid: <1319318313.14.0.68314351713.issue13244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年10月22日 21:18:32 | oberstet | link | issue13244 messages |
| 2011年10月22日 21:18:32 | oberstet | create |
|