Message144932
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
docs@python, meador.inge, terry.reedy, vladris |
| Date |
2011年10月04日.23:51:15 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.1505622e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1317772275.78.0.121151886567.issue12880@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
If I understand correctly, this doc patch would apply to 2.7 and 3.2 also. I have two style comments. I believe
"It is important to note that bit field allocation and layout in memory is not defined as a standard, rather its implementation is compiler-specific."
could be shortened to
"Bit field allocation and memory layout is compiler-specific."
To me, this leads nicely into the proposed sentence that follows.
"it is recommended that no assumptions are made about the structure size and layout."
I do not like 'it is recommended'. Let us state the fact.
"any assumptions about the structure size and layout may be wrong." |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年10月04日 23:51:15 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, meador.inge, docs@python, vladris |
| 2011年10月04日 23:51:15 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1317772275.78.0.121151886567.issue12880@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年10月04日 23:51:15 | terry.reedy | link | issue12880 messages |
| 2011年10月04日 23:51:15 | terry.reedy | create |
|