Message144607
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, belopolsky, jcea, khenriksson, larry, lars.gustaebel, loewis, mark.dickinson, nadeem.vawda, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年09月29日.17:47:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.004635203 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1317318428.24.0.759076196311.issue11457@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> BTW, what is the status of cdecimal?
I just wrote the same in another issue, but not everyone is subscribed
to that:
I think cdecimal is finished and production ready. The version in
http://hg.python.org/features/cdecimal#py3k-cdecimal
is the same as what will be released as cdecimal-2.3 in a couple of
weeks. cdecimal-2.3 has a monumental test suite against *both*
decimal.py and decNumber. The test suite no longer finds any
kind of (unknown) divergence between decimal.py, cdecimal and
decNumber.
Tests for cdecimal-2.3 have been running on 6 cores for more
than half a year.
In short, review would be highly welcome. ;) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年09月29日 17:47:08 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, loewis, jcea, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, lars.gustaebel, vstinner, larry, nadeem.vawda, Arfrever, r.david.murray, Alexander.Belopolsky, rosslagerwall, khenriksson |
| 2011年09月29日 17:47:08 | skrah | set | messageid: <1317318428.24.0.759076196311.issue11457@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年09月29日 17:47:07 | skrah | link | issue11457 messages |
| 2011年09月29日 17:47:07 | skrah | create |
|