Message144483
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
alex, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年09月24日.02:36:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.5363867e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1316831805.14.0.86000360703.issue13012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
One changeset per issue is a general goal. So is the ability to review patches. Sometime people forget to add a News or Acks entry and have to followup with an addendum. (Mark's patch still lack that, for instance.) Sometimes a patch is so large that a reviewer asks or requires splitting. In this case, each patch is large enough and touches enough files (up to 10 I think) that two is plausible. What would not be appreciated by either a reviewer or commit-list recipients would be one patch file per patched file. That would be a patch bomb indeed ;-) |
|