Message144085
| Author |
lars.gustaebel |
| Recipients |
Christophe Simonis, Garen, Nam.Nguyen, amaury.forgeotdarc, arekm, asvetlov, barry, doko, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, jcea, jeremybanks, jreese, lars.gustaebel, leonov, loewis, nadeem.vawda, nicdumz, nikratio, ockham-razor, pitrou, proyvind, rcoyner, shirish, strombrg, thedjatclubrock, tshepang, ysj.ray |
| Date |
2011年09月15日.16:14:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.1771127e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1316103256.93.0.161325210701.issue6715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Today I played around with lzma support for tarfile based on your last patch (see issue5689). There are a few minor issues that I just wanted to mention, as they break the tarfile testsuite:
- LZMAFile does not expose a name attribute. BZ2File doesn't either (not in 3.x anyway), but GzipFile does.
- LZMAFile does not allow a 'b' in the mode argument, unlike GzipFile and BZ2File.
- The bz2 module exposes many error conditions as standard Python exceptions, e.g. IOError, EOFError. The lzma module uses LZMAError for all errors without distinction. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年09月15日 16:14:17 | lars.gustaebel | set | recipients:
+ lars.gustaebel, loewis, barry, georg.brandl, doko, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, arekm, pitrou, nadeem.vawda, nicdumz, eric.araujo, Christophe Simonis, rcoyner, proyvind, asvetlov, nikratio, leonov, Garen, ysj.ray, thedjatclubrock, ockham-razor, jreese, strombrg, shirish, tshepang, jeremybanks, Nam.Nguyen |
| 2011年09月15日 16:14:16 | lars.gustaebel | set | messageid: <1316103256.93.0.161325210701.issue6715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年09月15日 16:14:16 | lars.gustaebel | link | issue6715 messages |
| 2011年09月15日 16:14:16 | lars.gustaebel | create |
|