Message142718
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
ncoghlan, pitrou, skrah |
| Date |
2011年08月22日.11:13:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.6600667e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1314011611.8.0.941911218938.issue12817@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hello,
in my private repo I've changed memoryview's getbufferproc to be PEP-3118
compliant. test_multiprocessing does the equivalent of the following sequence,
which is not allowed by PEP-3118:
>>> import array, io
>>> a = array.array('i', [1,2,3,4,5])
>>> m = memoryview(a)
>>> m.format
'i'
>>> buf = io.BytesIO(bytearray(5))
>>> buf.readinto(m)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: expected an object with a writable buffer interface
>>>
The error occurs in Objects/abstract.c:315:
((*pb->bf_getbuffer)(obj, &view, PyBUF_WRITABLE) != 0))
Here, PyObject_AsWriteBuffer() requests a simple writable buffer of unsigned
bytes *without format information* from the memoryview. The memoryview's
getbufferproc is required to return an error:
"If format is not explicitly requested then the format must be returned
as NULL (which means "B", or unsigned bytes)."
But the underlying buffer has format 'i' and not 'B', hence the error.
Antoine, is it correct that io.BytesIO should only be used with bytearray
buffers?
If so, this is a bug in the tests (patch attached). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年08月22日 11:13:31 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| 2011年08月22日 11:13:31 | skrah | set | messageid: <1314011611.8.0.941911218938.issue12817@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年08月22日 11:13:31 | skrah | link | issue12817 messages |
| 2011年08月22日 11:13:30 | skrah | create |
|