Message141780
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, louiscipher, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年08月08日.14:35:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.5671521e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1312814105.91.0.579798295786.issue12301@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
instead of*
An addition: in some cases, it may be on purpose that someone used ``somename`` instead of :func:`somename`, for example to avoid a ton of link in the doc of the somename function. For the most part however, I believe it was just unawareness (or maybe unavailability) of the :data: construct that explains its absence.
One last precision: markup like ``getattr(spam, ham)`` should stay untouched: it is a code snippet, not just a reference to the function. |
|