Message141577
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
brandon-rhodes, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ncoghlan, sandro.tosi |
| Date |
2011年08月02日.18:29:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.26265e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1312309799.2.0.505626346006.issue11561@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I think your suggestions are all good ones, and I have incorporated
> them into the file.
Great :) You left some commented-out debugging prints.
> (But do note that the departures we are now making from Ned's own
> copy of the tracer code — removing the commented-out debugging
> statement, and the long comment, and the inheritance from object —
> might make it harder to bring in changes from his own copy if he
> should ever further improve it.)
I’m not concerned by this. I’ve been doing merges all the time for more that a year, and having a few diverging lines is not a big deal.
> I have tried to write the comments to be more informative, while also
> addressing your own ideas; let me know if you like the result!
I do!
> Oh: and, I am continuing to use this new file in my own work on the
> Python core, and it has been working fine — so no problems with the
> actual code have developed over these first 3+ months of use.
This is a good thing to know.
I’ll let Brett take over now. |
|