Message141109
| Author |
petri.lehtinen |
| Recipients |
giampaolo.rodola, neologix, petri.lehtinen, santoso.wijaya, socketpair |
| Date |
2011年07月25日.18:17:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.781417e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1311617859.69.0.586416083012.issue12463@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
OK, so this is intentional. But why? Why does it *have to* block on every call? It would be more reasonable to make in not block if serve_forever() is not running and for example add a function to check whether serve_forever() is running or not.
If for some reason it has to fail when serve_forever() is not running, a deadlock is still not good. An exception would be better. |
|