Message140785
| Author |
abingham |
| Recipients |
Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2011年07月21日.05:40:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.7215452e-12 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<CAEZidR11=Jfuf0QhUydittsgX+2wqaTP1kYZGHS5dJCgGtUBxg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1311170602.01.0.108817720696.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
OK, I created issue 12600 for dealing with parameterized TestCases as
opposed to individual tests.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:03 PM, R. David Murray <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Unless someone sees a clever way to implement both with the same mechanism, parameterizing test cases should probably be a separate issue. Doing it via subclassing is straightforward, which also argues for a separate issue, since an 'is this worth it' discussion should be done separately for that feature. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年07月21日 05:40:28 | abingham | set | recipients:
+ abingham, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, fperez, Yaroslav.Halchenko, nchauvat, eric.snow |
| 2011年07月21日 05:40:27 | abingham | link | issue7897 messages |
| 2011年07月21日 05:40:27 | abingham | create |
|