Message140702
| Author |
nneonneo |
| Recipients |
ned.deily, nneonneo, trent |
| Date |
2011年07月19日.22:34:01 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.6585108e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1311114842.05.0.411325658171.issue12587@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yes, it seems that way. Then the question is: why does the comment claim that it doesn't have a BOM?
Also, test_tokenize.py is wrong around line 651:
def test_utf8_coding_cookie_and_no_utf8_bom(self):
f = 'tokenize_tests-utf8-coding-cookie-and-utf8-bom-sig.txt'
self.assertTrue(self._testFile(f))
It reads the wrong file in this case, judging by the testcase name. (This makes it a duplicate of the test_utf8_coding_cookie_and_utf8_bom case) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年07月19日 22:34:02 | nneonneo | set | recipients:
+ nneonneo, ned.deily, trent |
| 2011年07月19日 22:34:02 | nneonneo | set | messageid: <1311114842.05.0.411325658171.issue12587@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年07月19日 22:34:01 | nneonneo | link | issue12587 messages |
| 2011年07月19日 22:34:01 | nneonneo | create |
|