Message140646
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Trundle, benjamin.peterson, eric.snow, georg.brandl, loewis, marienz, ncoghlan, orsenthil, pitrou, r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年07月19日.02:11:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00049934484 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1311041481.71.0.997060343487.issue11343@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yeah, at the level of *code* the origin doesn't really matter, so re-using the exception type is actually OK. However, for *people* seeing the stack trace, it may be useful to know what's genuinely illegal syntax and what's a limitation of the current implementation. The exception message is a good place for that additional detail. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年07月19日 02:11:21 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, loewis, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, orsenthil, marienz, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, r.david.murray, Trundle, eric.snow |
| 2011年07月19日 02:11:21 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1311041481.71.0.997060343487.issue11343@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年07月19日 02:11:21 | ncoghlan | link | issue11343 messages |
| 2011年07月19日 02:11:20 | ncoghlan | create |
|