Message140590
| Author |
doughellmann |
| Recipients |
Santiago.Romero, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, cgwalters, dexen, doughellmann, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, fperez, loewis, mark.dickinson, mcepl, nwerneck, orsenthil, r.david.murray, rhettinger, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年07月18日.14:36:32 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00034424267 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1310999793.41.0.927326823907.issue1170@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Is unicode supported by shlex in 3.x already? It's curious that unicode support is considered a new feature, rather than a bug. I understand wanting to allocate development resources carefully, though. If someone were to prepare a patch, would it even have a chance of being accepted in 2.7? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年07月18日 14:36:33 | doughellmann | set | recipients:
+ doughellmann, loewis, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, orsenthil, vstinner, dexen, benjamin.peterson, cgwalters, mcepl, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, nwerneck, fperez, Santiago.Romero |
| 2011年07月18日 14:36:33 | doughellmann | set | messageid: <1310999793.41.0.927326823907.issue1170@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年07月18日 14:36:32 | doughellmann | link | issue1170 messages |
| 2011年07月18日 14:36:32 | doughellmann | create |
|