Message140283
| Author |
cool-RR |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, cool-RR, cvrebert, eric.araujo, ganadist, giampaolo.rodola, rosslagerwall |
| Date |
2011年07月13日.16:23:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00032664184 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1310574220.27.0.826758939725.issue3177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Eric, I have no problem with this function being placed in `shutil` instead of `os`, as long as it's implemented and it's in the standard library, and people don't have to use subprocess to run open or xdg-open themselves as I currently do.
So I have no problem with renaming this bug to "Add shutil.open". |
|