Message140078
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
docs@python, eric.snow, orsenthil, r.david.murray, rhettinger |
| Date |
2011年07月10日.12:54:04 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00015504856 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1310302445.28.0.814815647002.issue12491@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
OK, I found the other issue and it looks like we agreed to use 'attributes and methods' where the reference was inclusive. I still think that it is less precise to think this way, but it is clearer exposition given the lack of a good term for non-method attributes. So now I agree that we should not change the existing glossary definition of attribute. |
|