Message139752
| Author |
jonas.wagner |
| Recipients |
MHordecki, efosmark, eric.araujo, flox, jonas.wagner, milesck, quentel, r.david.murray, taleinat, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年07月04日.11:26:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.1120001e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1309778795.84.0.0515895419717.issue12411@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hi Tal,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
My primary objective was to increase the test coverage for cgi.py. If it is a problem to have the additional tests in this patch I'm happy to create a new issue with a separate patch.
The default value for the boundary was an oversight, sorry for that.
You are right regarding the commented out boundary as well, I forgot to refresh the patch. Again, sorry.
Do you think valid_boundary should contain a check to ensure it is a byte object? |
|