Message 139724 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	rfk
Recipients	rfk
Date	2011年07月04日.00:56:39
SpamBayes Score	9.509825e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1309741000.66.0.461732700198.issue12483@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
According to the docs here: http://docs.python.org/c-api/gcsupport.html Any object that uses PyObject_GC_Track in its constructor must call PyObject_GC_UnTrack in its deallocator. The CThunkObject in _ctypes does the former but not the later. Attached patch adds a call to PyObject_GC_UnTrack. This doesn't fix any particular bug I was seeing, I just happened to be going through the _ctypes sources (you know, for fun...) and noticed this discrepancy.

Content

According to the docs here:
 http://docs.python.org/c-api/gcsupport.html
Any object that uses PyObject_GC_Track in its constructor must call PyObject_GC_UnTrack in its deallocator. The CThunkObject in _ctypes does the former but not the later. Attached patch adds a call to PyObject_GC_UnTrack.
This doesn't fix any particular bug I was seeing, I just happened to be going through the _ctypes sources (you know, for fun...) and noticed this discrepancy.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011年07月04日 00:56:40	rfk	set	recipients: + rfk
2011年07月04日 00:56:40	rfk	set	messageid: <1309741000.66.0.461732700198.issue12483@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011年07月04日 00:56:40	rfk	link	issue12483 messages
2011年07月04日 00:56:39	rfk	create

homepage