Message139562
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年07月01日.10:25:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.8818918e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1309515906.33.0.927447956049.issue12462@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
While reading floatsleep() (time.sleep) code for issue #12459, I noticed that the Python signal handler is not called in floatsleep() if a signal interrupted the sleep. Well, it just "works" because the bytecode evaluation loop will call PyErr_CheckSignals() before executing the next instruction (the C signal handler signals calls Py_AddPendingCall whichs signals that the pending call to the eval loop using "eval_breaker"), but it would be better to call it directly.
Attached calls explicitly and immediatly PyErr_CheckSignals() in the sleep and Windows implementations of floatsleep().
It's not really a bug, so I prefer to not touch Python 2.7 and 3.2, only Python 3.3. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年07月01日 10:25:06 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, pitrou |
| 2011年07月01日 10:25:06 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1309515906.33.0.927447956049.issue12462@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年07月01日 10:25:05 | vstinner | link | issue12462 messages |
| 2011年07月01日 10:25:05 | vstinner | create |
|