Message139560
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
eckhardt, pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年07月01日.09:41:51 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.3218308e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1309513312.68.0.13321343461.issue12459@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> According to Google Code Search, deliberate uses of sleep(-1)
> are almost non-existent:
The search gives two results, in pycaf and a plone installer (in "compilezpy.py"). I don't know what is the expected behaviour: "infinite" sleep? wait for a SIGINT signal? I'm ok to only change this in Python 3.3, it's not a good idea to introduce subtle differences in minor Python releases. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年07月01日 09:41:52 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, rhettinger, pitrou, eckhardt |
| 2011年07月01日 09:41:52 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1309513312.68.0.13321343461.issue12459@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年07月01日 09:41:52 | vstinner | link | issue12459 messages |
| 2011年07月01日 09:41:51 | vstinner | create |
|