Message139107
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
r.david.murray, ssbarnea, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年06月25日.18:26:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.827348e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1309026397.52.0.453790531508.issue12398@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
No, that's correct. In python 2.x the 'bytes' stuff is just a portability aid. In 2.x, bytes and string are the same type. In Python 3 they aren't, so by using the 'fake' classes in python2 you can often make your code work correctly on both python2 and python3.
So, can this issue be closed, or do you think there is still might be a valid backward compatibility issue? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年06月25日 18:26:37 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, terry.reedy, ssbarnea |
| 2011年06月25日 18:26:37 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1309026397.52.0.453790531508.issue12398@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年06月25日 18:26:37 | r.david.murray | link | issue12398 messages |
| 2011年06月25日 18:26:36 | r.david.murray | create |
|