Message138979
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, belopolsky, jcea, khenriksson, lars.gustaebel, loewis, mark.dickinson, nadeem.vawda, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年06月24日.20:36:28 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.7725194e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4E04F54B.8050206@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1308945338.07.0.729077321016.issue11457@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Hey, why nobody proposed datetime.datetime objects?
datetime.datetime is extremely bad at representing time stamps.
Don't use broken-down time if you can avoid it.
> By the way, Windows does also use timestamps with a nanosecond
> resolution, it's not specific to POSIX!
Actually, it doesn't. The Windows filetime data type uses units
of 100ns, starting on 1.1.1601. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年06月24日 20:36:29 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, jcea, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, lars.gustaebel, vstinner, nadeem.vawda, Arfrever, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, khenriksson |
| 2011年06月24日 20:36:28 | loewis | link | issue11457 messages |
| 2011年06月24日 20:36:28 | loewis | create |
|