Message138878
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
jackdied, pitrou, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年06月23日.23:11:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.000169885 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1308870672.44.0.494522322275.issue11812@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
With a bit of searching, HOST == support.HOST == 'localhost'. Looking at the traceback, it is socket that fails, not telnetlib or its test. Hence the clearer title.
I am still curious what you propose: catch and skip or something else? For Windows, I consider a one-time event like this a routine random glitch to be ignored at least until it repeats ;-). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年06月23日 23:11:12 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, pitrou, vstinner, jackdied |
| 2011年06月23日 23:11:12 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1308870672.44.0.494522322275.issue11812@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年06月23日 23:11:11 | terry.reedy | link | issue11812 messages |
| 2011年06月23日 23:11:11 | terry.reedy | create |
|