Message137593
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, belopolsky, jcea, khenriksson, lars.gustaebel, loewis, mark.dickinson, nadeem.vawda, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall |
| Date |
2011年06月03日.21:50:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0002825822 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<BANLkTiky8Hf03gVEuFy-v-cAg0K92sPVTQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1307131071.91.0.794356823268.issue11457@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> I suggest that rather than using composite time stamps, decimal.Decimal is used to represent high-precision time in Python.
I support this idea in theory, but as long as decimal is implemented
in Python, os module should probably expose a low level (tuple-based?)
interface and a higher level module would provide Decimal-based
high-precision time.
BTW, what is the status of cdecimal? |
|