Message137083
| Author |
stutzbach |
| Recipients |
cvrebert, docs@python, ezio.melotti, rhettinger, stutzbach, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年05月27日.16:45:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
9.758604e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1306514737.18.0.568822302015.issue12192@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Comment: This rule applies to special methods like __getitem__
> and __setitem__. 'lis.append(item)' is equivalent to
> lis.__setitem__(len(lis):len(lis), item), so it should not be so
> surprising that it has the same return.
It's not true for all special methods. __iadd__ and __imul__ return the list itself.
That's a minor nitpick though. +1 on adding "and return None" to the docstrings of methods that often trip people up. Not everyone will read them, but some people will. |
|