Message137071
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, exarkun, gregory.p.smith, jcea, loewis, marcin.bachry, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, schmichael, skrah, spiv, tseaver, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年05月27日.16:05:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0022197133 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1306512320.89.0.122181363068.issue8407@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Oooooh, sigwait() doesn't accept a timeout! I would be nice to have also sigwaitinfo().. and maybe also its friend, sigwaitinfo() (if we implement the former, it's trivial to implement the latter). Python 3.3 adds optional timeout to subprocess.wait(), subprocess.communicate(), threading.Lock.acquire(), etc. And I love timeout! It was really useful to implement the thread of faulthandler.dump_tracebacks_later(). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年05月27日 16:05:21 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, loewis, gregory.p.smith, jcea, spiv, exarkun, tseaver, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, marcin.bachry, schmichael, skrah, neologix, python-dev |
| 2011年05月27日 16:05:20 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1306512320.89.0.122181363068.issue8407@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年05月27日 16:05:20 | vstinner | link | issue8407 messages |
| 2011年05月27日 16:05:20 | vstinner | create |
|