Message 136620 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	neologix
Recipients	neologix, pitrou, ryan003, victorpoluceno, vstinner
Date	2011年05月23日.12:14:21
SpamBayes Score	4.221379e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1306152862.21.0.798153120568.issue5715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Oh, Linux 2.6.27+ has a SOCK_CLOEXEC option: It's not exactly the same thing. We want to close the socket right after fork, not wait until exec (in the OP case there was no exec). > Patch looks fine to me. Is it easily testable? Easily, no.

Content

> Oh, Linux 2.6.27+ has a SOCK_CLOEXEC option:
It's not exactly the same thing.
We want to close the socket right after fork, not wait until exec (in the OP case there was no exec).
> Patch looks fine to me. Is it easily testable?
Easily, no.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011年05月23日 12:14:22	neologix	set	recipients: + neologix, pitrou, vstinner, ryan003, victorpoluceno
2011年05月23日 12:14:22	neologix	set	messageid: <1306152862.21.0.798153120568.issue5715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011年05月23日 12:14:21	neologix	link	issue5715 messages
2011年05月23日 12:14:21	neologix	create

homepage