Message135982
| Author |
dsdale24 |
| Recipients |
Darren.Dale, benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, dsdale24, ncoghlan, ned.deily |
| Date |
2011年05月14日.18:27:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.011466e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<BANLkTinQdKy8Z1pyfdJZWVPms_Lb=aMxzQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<BANLkTikTOrcXw8dog1rwHGm98T2YaL31Jg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> added the comment:
>
> 2011年5月14日 Darren Dale <report@bugs.python.org>:
>>
>> Darren Dale <dsdale24@gmail.com> added the comment:
>>
>> Is there anything preventing this patch from being merged?
>
> I have to make time to think about the API a bit more.
Ok. Maybe you will come up with another alternative that hadn't
occurred to me. But I have given this issue quite a bit of thought,
considered several alternatives, and felt fortunate to find a solution
that preserves backwards compatibility, supports the property
decorator syntax, and meshes well with the existing syntax for
abstract methods. Perhaps, if you shared your concerns, I could help
address them and maybe save you some time.
Darrren |
|