Message135729
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, jcon, nirai, pitrou, stutzbach, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年05月10日.19:18:51 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00027735156 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1305055129.3569.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1305054390.14.0.664085358478.issue9971@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Also, while we're at it, would it be worthwhile for me to make a patch
> for the prefech() method you proposed? Should a separate issue be
> created for that? I know there was no definitive answer in the email
> thread but it may be fun to experiment with as well.
It would be worthwhile and I am certainly in favour it it, although I
can't guarantee that it can go in in the end.
(yes, a separate issue should definitely be created) |
|