Message135699
| Author |
sdaoden |
| Recipients |
nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, santoso.wijaya, sdaoden, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年05月10日.11:59:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.991263e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<20110510115934.GA23147@sherwood.local> |
| In-reply-to |
<1304976994.14.0.502934856435.issue11877@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
I don't agree with you and i don't believe it is implemented like
that. But it seems i am the only one on this issue who sees it
like that. Thus i apply 11877.6.diff.
> Declaring variables as "auto" is not necessary in C code and not
> used anywhere else in Python's source code
Changed.
> Steffen, you changed the default to doing a "full sync" in your
> last patch
Changed all through.
> The reason being that Apple and NetBSD folks should know what
> they're doing [.]
> People requiring write durability will probably manage to find
> this full_sync parameter.
This sounds logical. I've changed the doc in os.rst so that it
includes a note on *which* operating systems actually do something
dependend on that argument.
I should have done that from the very beginning.
> Finally, depending on the workload, it could have a significant
> performance impact.
:-) |
| Files |
| File name |
Uploaded |
|
11877.6.diff
|
sdaoden,
2011年05月10日.11:59:51
|
|