Message135683
| Author |
rhettinger |
| Recipients |
georg.brandl, rhettinger |
| Date |
2011年05月10日.07:10:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.0678838e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1305011417.66.0.772709017381.issue12047@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> there's a "talk down them" which looks funny to me in this word order.
It was missing a word. Should be "talk down to them". Thanks for spotting this -- I fix it in the commit.
> One question: I could imagine wording like
> "this is rarely needed" instead of "this is experts only"
> -- would you say it will be effective in making people
> think if they really want to do that?
Something along these lines would be a step in the right direction (though "rarely needed" is problematic if happens to match the readers need at the moment). At this point, I would be happy just to get rid of the danger-experts-only remarks. Just about any substitute would be better. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年05月10日 07:10:17 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, georg.brandl |
| 2011年05月10日 07:10:17 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1305011417.66.0.772709017381.issue12047@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年05月10日 07:10:08 | rhettinger | link | issue12047 messages |
| 2011年05月10日 07:10:08 | rhettinger | create |
|