Message135619
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, loewis, ned.deily, ronaldoussoren |
| Date |
2011年05月09日.17:43:48 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.7592495e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1304963029.51.0.263393004655.issue10666@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Even if used a different file name, you still have to set up two
> different sets of directives.
I was assuming this would not be a problem: the .inputrc (or hypothetical .editrc file) is written once for all applications, it’s not a Python-specific task. What I didn’t see is that users do not necessarily know about which file is used, so it’s at least a doc problem.
For the perceived problem with licensing, I’m adding Martin to nosy, not because he’s a PSF director but because he’s had to make similar choices for the Windows installers.
Martin, here’s the context: the Mac installer sometimes builds readline with the real readline or libedit. There’s a doc problem which can be solved either by always using the same lib. The easiest to implement now would be choosing readline, but Ned says: "The main drawback to the trivial suggestion is that it continues to pull in GNU readline, which is now GPLv3-licensed, into the python.org OS X installers. In general, we try to avoid shipping GPL-licensed software since it can complicate the allowable usages of the installed Python." Could you provide advice? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年05月09日 17:43:49 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, loewis, ronaldoussoren, ned.deily |
| 2011年05月09日 17:43:49 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1304963029.51.0.263393004655.issue10666@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年05月09日 17:43:48 | eric.araujo | link | issue10666 messages |
| 2011年05月09日 17:43:48 | eric.araujo | create |
|