Message135499
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, exarkun, gregory.p.smith, loewis, marcin.bachry, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, schmichael, spiv, tseaver, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年05月07日.19:38:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
9.3394465e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1304797083.3526.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1304762460.2.0.823890484797.issue8407@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> pending_signals-3.patch:
> - don't check for pending signals in sigwait()
> - pthread_kill() doc: it is not a good idea to say that pthread_kill() with signum=0 can be used to check if a thread identifier is valid => such test does crash (SIGSEGV) on my Linux box. I changed the doc to say that it can be used to check if a thread is still running (which is different).
> - add a dedicated test for sigpending()
> - doc: explain how to get a thread identifier for pthread_kill()
> - don't compile pthread_kill() without threads: you cannot get a valid thread identifier without the _thread module
>
> I think that the patch is ready to be commited. Anyone for a last
> review? (antoine, neologix?)
It looks good to me.
It's very nice to have all these extra functions :) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年05月07日 19:38:07 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, gregory.p.smith, spiv, exarkun, tseaver, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, marcin.bachry, schmichael, neologix, python-dev |
| 2011年05月07日 19:38:06 | pitrou | link | issue8407 messages |
| 2011年05月07日 19:38:05 | pitrou | create |
|