Message135239
| Author |
sdaoden |
| Recipients |
ixokai, nadeem.vawda, ned.deily, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, sdaoden, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年05月05日.20:28:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.4382188e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<20110505202838.GA17620@sherwood.local> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
In fact i like my idea of using iterations.
I have some time tomorrow, so if nobody complains until then,
i write diffs for the tests of 3.x and 2.7 with these updates:
- Two different target sizes:
1. 0xFFFFFFFF + x (7)
2. 0x7FFFFFFF + x (7)
- On 32 bit systems, use iterations on a potentially safe buffer
size. I think 0x40000000 a.k.a 1024*1024*1024 is affordable,
but 512 MB are probably more safe? I'll make that a variable.
- The string will be 'DeadAffe' (8).
- The last 4 bytes of the string will always be read on their own
(just in case the large buffer sizes irritated something down
the path). |
|