This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | facundobatista |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, exarkun, facundobatista, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner |
| Date | 2011年05月05日.18:45:59 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0012768668 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1304621159.79.0.814665093364.issue6116@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Antoine, to see if I understood correctly... if we build the dict, and just return it but don't save it in the frame, this leak would be solved? (yes, it'd be slower because everytime it's asked, it'd need to be built again) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011年05月05日 18:45:59 | facundobatista | set | recipients: + facundobatista, gvanrossum, rhettinger, exarkun, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson |
| 2011年05月05日 18:45:59 | facundobatista | set | messageid: <1304621159.79.0.814665093364.issue6116@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年05月05日 18:45:59 | facundobatista | link | issue6116 messages |
| 2011年05月05日 18:45:59 | facundobatista | create | |