Message135207
| Author |
sdaoden |
| Recipients |
r.david.murray, sdaoden |
| Date |
2011年05月05日.14:28:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00011316889 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<20110505142808.GA70318@sherwood.local> |
| In-reply-to |
<1304595748.98.0.796340638276.issue11935@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Thu, 5 May 2011 13:42:29 +0200, R. David Murray wrote:
> what does mutt do in the case you are talking about?
16 -rwxr-s--- 1 steffen mail 14832 23 Jan 19:13 usr/bin/mutt_bitlock
set bitlock_program="~/usr/bin/mutt_bitlock -p"
I see. Unfortunately the world is not even almost perfect.
So should f?truncate(2) be used if the resulting file is empty?
> what does mutt do in the case you are talking about?
Otherwise there is only one solution: a mailbox-is-readonly policy
has to be introduced.
That will surely drive users insane which see that they in fact
have write access to the file.
Python has got bad cards. |
|