Message134116
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pwerneck, rodsenra, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年04月20日.01:07:31 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.8642327e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<BANLkTi=3RC5asgr9hPO37e7AjeTLsK0qiw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1303245811.02.0.750959202745.issue1294232@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
This last point sounds like an error in PEP 3115 rather than an error
in the implementation - as the exception says, the metaclass of a
derived class must be the same as or a subclass of the metaclasses of
all of its bases. Since that rule applies recursively, and all classes
in 3.x implicitly inherit from object, it follows that all metaclasses
must directly or indirectly inherit from type. |
|