homepage

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author neologix
Recipients gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, rnk, vstinner
Date 2011年04月09日.18:13:32
SpamBayes Score 1.1265783e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <BANLkTim1QMEePYdewVD+EUcjKe0Mr20nvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1302247212.14280.8.camel@marge>
Content
> Oh, I didn't know. In this case, is my commit 3664fc29e867 correct? I
> think that it is, because without the patch, subprocess may call poll()
> with a negative timeout, and so it is no more a timeout at all.
>
Yes, it looks correct.
But I think there are a couple places left where functions can be
called with a negative timeout, for example here :
 1537 stdout, stderr =
self._communicate_with_select(input, endtime,
 1538
orig_timeout)
 1539
 1540 self.wait(timeout=self._remaining_time(endtime))
or here:
 1113 if self.stdout is not None:
 1114 self.stdout_thread.join(self._remaining_time(endtime))
 1115 if self.stdout_thread.isAlive():
Also, it might be simpler and cleaner to factorize the raising of the
TimeoutExpired exception inside _remaining_time, instead of scattering
this kind of checks around the file:
 1514 remaining = self._remaining_time(endtime)
 1515 if remaining <= 0:
 1516 raise TimeoutExpired(self.args, timeout)
merging what's done in _check_timeout
History
Date User Action Args
2011年04月09日 18:13:32neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, rnk, python-dev
2011年04月09日 18:13:32neologixlinkissue11757 messages
2011年04月09日 18:13:32neologixcreate

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /