Message133378
| Author |
mjs0 |
| Recipients |
Trundle, daniel.urban, docs@python, eric.araujo, jonathan.hartley, mjs0, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年04月09日.09:04:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.4414853e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1302339890.02.0.540957324141.issue11796@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thanks to everyone for the explanations.
I was hoping for behaviour along the lines of Python 2 (certainly not artificially blocking more cases in the name of consistency) but it doesn't look like that's going to happen. I think this is one slight and rare area where Python 3 has taken a step backwards when compared to Python 2 but I can live with it. As noted there's other ways to achieve the same thing.
The new Python 3 behaviour seems odd to me but perhaps that's just a bias due to many years of development with Python 2. A documentation improvement would help.
Thanks. |
|