Message133359
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
Trundle, daniel.urban, docs@python, eric.araujo, jonathan.hartley, mjs0, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年04月09日.00:22:09 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.4531782e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1302308530.88.0.0436116215518.issue11796@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Devs are aware that there is an exception to the general rule for the 'for' clause. There is a technical reason why the exception is possible, though I have forgotten it.
Since you already know that changing the general behavior has been rejected, are you asking that the exception be removed (for consistency) , so that your first example would fail? If so, that will be rejected also.
I am changing this to a doc issue in case you or someone else wishes to suggest a doc improvement.
The solution to the limitation on generator expressions, of course, is to write out the generator one is trying to abbreviate.
def clipper(max):
for i in range(5):
if i < max:
yield i
class Foo:
x = 3
y = list(clipper(x))
print(Foo.y)
# [0, 1, 2] |
|