Message133298
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Pablo.Bitton, abbot, astrand, belopolsky, brian.curtin, dmalcolm, filippo, gd2shoe, giampaolo.rodola, guettli, matthieu.labbe, orsenthil, pitrou, r.david.murray, ragnar, rnk, srid, tim.golden, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年04月08日.07:23:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00012286322 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1302247398.65.0.854835343393.issue5673@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I fixed a bug in _communicate_with_poll(): raise an error if the endtime-time() is negative. If poll() is called with a negative timeout, it blocks until it gets an event.
New changeset 3664fc29e867 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #11757: subprocess ensures that select() and poll() timeout >= 0
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3664fc29e867
By the way, the doc modified by [c4a0fa6e687c] is still wrong: the timeout feature was introduced in 3.3, not in 3.2. And the change is not documented in Misc/NEWS.
@Reid Kleckner: Can you fix that? (I reopen this issue to not forget) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年04月08日 07:23:19 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, guettli, astrand, belopolsky, orsenthil, pitrou, ragnar, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, abbot, gd2shoe, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, rnk, srid, matthieu.labbe, dmalcolm, filippo, Pablo.Bitton |
| 2011年04月08日 07:23:18 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1302247398.65.0.854835343393.issue5673@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年04月08日 07:23:17 | vstinner | link | issue5673 messages |
| 2011年04月08日 07:23:17 | vstinner | create |
|