Message132994
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
Jay.Taylor, Neil Muller, amaury.forgeotdarc, andersjm, belopolsky, catlee, davidfraser, erik.stephens, guettli, hodgestar, jribbens, mark.dickinson, ping, pitrou, r.david.murray, steve.roberts, tim.peters, tomster, vivanov, vstinner, werneck |
| Date |
2011年04月05日.00:29:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.875757e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<BANLkTi=aP5GU8=AnxUkcAcMjKYCs2Za+2g@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1301953325.82.0.162674835519.issue2736@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Jay Taylor <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> I couldn't agree more with ping's position on this.
Adding votes to a tracker issue without a working patch will not move
it any further. There are several committers besides me in the nosy
list including the original author of the datetime module. If it was
such a universally desired feature as Ka-Ping makes it sound, it would
be committed long before I became the maintainer of the datetime
module.
> It is against the spirit of what Python has set out to be, and the blocking needs to stop.
I don't think any committer has a power to *block* a patch. I
certainly don't. If Ka-Ping wants to add a feature over my
objections, it is well within his power to do so. (Note that I
objected to timedelta.total_seconds(), but it was added nevertheless.)
It would be best, however to bring this to python-dev or python-ideas
first.
> Any chance we could get a .epoch() function into python 2.7 as well?
No. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年04月05日 00:29:51 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, tim.peters, ping, jribbens, guettli, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, davidfraser, pitrou, andersjm, catlee, vstinner, tomster, werneck, hodgestar, Neil Muller, erik.stephens, steve.roberts, r.david.murray, vivanov, Jay.Taylor |
| 2011年04月05日 00:29:50 | belopolsky | link | issue2736 messages |
| 2011年04月05日 00:29:50 | belopolsky | create |
|