Message 132661 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	jnoller
Recipients	Albert.Strasheim, aljungberg, asksol, bquinlan, gdb, hongqn, jnoller, pitrou, vlasovskikh, vstinner
Date	2011年03月31日.12:28:29
SpamBayes Score	4.6726354e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<BANLkTinOxWYh9ZwKOF4kjx2zyQJOpnuF=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1301574338.12.0.437023762009.issue9205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment: > > Speaking of which, I wonder why we have both multiprocessing.Pool and concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor. They seem to fill the exact same needs, with different APIs... > Brian and I need to work on the consolidation we intend(ed) to occur as people got comfortable with the APIs. My eventual goal is to remove anything but the basic multiprocessing.Process/Queue stuff out of MP and into concurrent.* and support threading backends for it.

Content

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> Speaking of which, I wonder why we have both multiprocessing.Pool and concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor. They seem to fill the exact same needs, with different APIs...
>
Brian and I need to work on the consolidation we intend(ed) to occur
as people got comfortable with the APIs. My eventual goal is to remove
anything but the basic multiprocessing.Process/Queue stuff out of MP
and into concurrent.* and support threading backends for it.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011年03月31日 12:28:29	jnoller	set	recipients: + jnoller, bquinlan, pitrou, vstinner, hongqn, asksol, vlasovskikh, gdb, Albert.Strasheim, aljungberg
2011年03月31日 12:28:29	jnoller	link	issue9205 messages
2011年03月31日 12:28:29	jnoller	create

homepage