Message132589
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
asvetlov, brian.curtin, flox, jafo, jaraco, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, techtonik, tim.golden |
| Date |
2011年03月30日.13:49:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.6538584e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1301487146.3571.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<4D8F70FA.20504@timgolden.me.uk> |
| Content |
> * Patch Py_DeleteFileW in posixmodule.c so that it renames before
> deleting: should solve the problem overall but obviously has a
> possible wider impact, in general and on performance in particular.
> This rename might be a simple rename-to-guid or something more
> sophisticated such as the rename-to-recycler which cygwin uses.
>
> * Patch support.unlink in the test package to do the rename dance on
> the basis that it'll fix at least some of the problems with less
> impact overall.
>
> Opinions? I'm willing to do either.
Well, since I'm not a Windows expert, I can only give an intuitive
opinion. I think that we should start with patching support.unlink();
tweaking Py_DeleteFile() so as to do something more sophisticated than a
simple removal sounds like it could hide some behaviour change that
could hit some legitimate uses.
(as an aside, for higher-level variants of OS functions, the shutil may
be an appropriate recipient) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年03月30日 13:49:43 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, jafo, jaraco, ncoghlan, techtonik, tim.golden, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, asvetlov, flox |
| 2011年03月30日 13:49:40 | pitrou | link | issue7443 messages |
| 2011年03月30日 13:49:40 | pitrou | create |
|