Message132333
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
asvetlov, brian.curtin, flox, jafo, jaraco, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, techtonik, tim.golden |
| Date |
2011年03月27日.14:33:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00297438 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1301236426.3568.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<4D8F4858.1020001@timgolden.me.uk> |
| Content |
> I did start to undertake a conversion of TESTFN to a named temporary,
> but it started to sprawl all over the place and came up against a
> number of corner cases (eg where tests deliberately wanted two
> filenames to be the same) so I gave up.
How about renaming to a unique random name just before the unlink(), as
Mercurial does?
Would it alleviate the problem or am I missing something? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年03月27日 14:33:50 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, jafo, jaraco, ncoghlan, techtonik, tim.golden, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, asvetlov, flox |
| 2011年03月27日 14:33:49 | pitrou | link | issue7443 messages |
| 2011年03月27日 14:33:49 | pitrou | create |
|