Message132010
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
barry, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, orsenthil, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年03月24日.17:08:37 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00016340046 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1300986514.3957.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<AANLkTi=z1yqK-Y4FZnSPHRKBTfokoi-JpzO=UdYRoTw=@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
> > Senthil's patch allows a redirect to ftp while Guido's doesn't.
>
> That is a good question. Should we? It doesn't look like ftp:
> participates in the vulnerability, but I'm not sure how useful it is
> either.
I would say accept it anyway. That way we minimize potential for
compatibility breakage.
(do we support "ftps" as well? I don't think so)
> > Senthil's patch doesn't seem to fix urllib-inherited code, only
> urllib2- (see FancyURLopener.redirect_internal()).
>
> Right, that's for Python 3.
FancyURLopener is still present in Python 3 (even though we would like
to deprecate it in 3.3). |
|