Message131742
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
techtonik, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年03月22日.11:57:45 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00024218572 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1300795066.4.0.747265328376.issue11633@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> How about making print() user-friendly with flushing after every call,
> and if you want explicitly want speed - use buffered
> sys.stdout.write/flush()?
This is exactly the -u option of Python 2: use it if you would like a completly unbuffered sys.stdout in a portable way.
In Python 3, it is only useful to flush at each line, even if the output is not a console, but a pipe (e.g. output redirected to a file). But nobody asked yet to have a fully unbuffered sys.stdout in Python 3. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年03月22日 11:57:46 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, techtonik |
| 2011年03月22日 11:57:46 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1300795066.4.0.747265328376.issue11633@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年03月22日 11:57:45 | vstinner | link | issue11633 messages |
| 2011年03月22日 11:57:45 | vstinner | create |
|