Message131686
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
brian.curtin, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, pitrou, sbt, tim.golden |
| Date |
2011年03月21日.20:40:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0005414067 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1300740043.3516.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1300739890.8.0.602757957454.issue11618@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Antoine: I notice that even the fast path contains a ResetEvent()
> call. I think this is a kernel call and so just as expensive as
> directly using a semaphore :)
Yes, in my timings it doesn't show significant improvements compared to
the semaphore approach (although again it's on a VM, so I'm not sure how
much this reflects a native Windows system). |
|