Message131527
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
brian.curtin, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, pitrou, sbt, tim.golden |
| Date |
2011年03月20日.19:07:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
8.303293e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1300648047.3481.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1300647091.7.0.855144541193.issue11618@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Have you tried benchmarking it?
>
> Interlocked functions are *much* faster than Win32 mutex/semaphores in
> the uncontended case.
Well, I'd rather have obviously correct code than
difficult-to-understand "speedy" code.
The patch I've posted takes less than a microsecond per acquire/release
pair, and that's in a virtual machine to begin with.
> Do you really want the GIL to be 10 times slower in the uncontended case? ;-)
The GIL doesn't use these functions (see ceval_gil.h). |
|