Message130775
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
db3l, ned.deily, pitrou, ronaldoussoren |
| Date |
2011年03月13日.23:00:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.3163914e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1300057220.3763.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1300055554.12.0.72151606671.issue11487@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I suspect this may be an issue now because the old svn approach was a
> full checkout for each build, whereas the hg approach is to pull to
> the local clone, and then just update the build tree. So in the svn
> case all the files would have a good shot at the same timestamp,
> whereas with the hg approach the generated files get stale if the
> contents don't change.
>
> I wonder if just doing a full checkout from the local clone would be
> closer to the old svn behavior in general with respect to timestamps
> and maybe a reasonable policy?
Ok, I've made the change on the DMG builders. |
|